The Shroud of Turin: Has the identity of the imprinted face been confirmed as Christ?
Posted: Friday, November 20, 2009
by Edward Rhymes
Has the Shroud of Turin be authenticated as belonging to Jesus? Vatican researcher Dr Barbara Frale believes so. She says, "I think I have managed to read the burial certificate of Jesus the Nazarene, or Jesus of Nazareth." She said that she had reconstructed it from fragments of Greek, Hebrew and Latin writing imprinted on the cloth together with the image of the crucified man. The shroud, which is kept in the royal chapel of Turin Cathedral and is to be put in display next spring, is regarded by many scholars as a medieval forgery. A 1988 carbon dating of a fragment of the cloth dated it to the Middle Ages.
However Dr Frale, who is to publish her findings in a new book, La Sindone di Gesu Nazareno (The Shroud of Jesus of Nazareth) said that the inscription provided "historical date consistent with the Gospels account". The letters, barely visible to the naked eye, were first spotted during an examination of the shroud in 1978, and others have since come to light.
Dr. Frale disputes the claims that the shroud was from the Middle Ages because the text written on the cloth refers to Jesus as "the Nazarene" and not the Son of God (which would have been considered heresy in medieval times).
The letter could only be properly deciphered through in negative photographs (sort of like a backwards writing being complete understood when held up to a mirror.
Dr Frale told La Repubblica (the second largest-circulated Italian daily) that under Jewish burial practices current at the time of Christ in a Roman colony such as Palestine, a body buried after a death sentence could only be returned to the family after a year in a common grave.
She says, "I think I have managed to read the burial certificate of Jesus the Nazarene, or Jesus of Nazareth."
However Dr Frale, who is to publish her findings in a new book, La Sindone di Gesu Nazareno (The Shroud of Jesus of Nazareth) said that the inscription provided "historical date consistent with the Gospels account". The letters, barely visible to the naked eye, were first spotted during an examination of the shroud in 1978, and others have since come to light.
Dr. Frale disputes the claims that the shroud was from the Middle Ages because the text written on the cloth refers to Jesus as "the Nazarene" and not the Son of God (which would have been considered heresy in medieval times).
The letter could only be properly deciphered through in negative photographs (sort of like a backwards writing being complete understood when held up to a mirror).
The death certificate was glued to the face of the deceased so that the body could be later recognized and retrieved.
Dr Frale said that the use of three languages was consistent with the polyglot nature of a community of Greek-speaking Jews in a Roman colony. Best known for her studies of the Knights Templar, who she claims at one stage, preserved the shroud, she further stated what she had deciphered was "the death sentence on a man called Jesus the Nazarene. If that man was also Christ the Son of God it is beyond my job to establish. I did not set out to demonstrate the truth of faith. I am a Catholic, but all my teachers have been atheists or agnostics, and the only believer among them was a Jew. I forced myself to work on this as I would have done on any other archaeological find."
Dr. Frale disputes the claims that the shroud was from the Middle Ages because the text written on the cloth refers to Jesus as "the Nazarene" and not the Son of God (which would have been considered heresy in medieval times).
The letter could only be properly deciphered through in negative photographs (sort of like a backwards writing being complete understood when held up to a mirror.
Dr Frale told La Repubblica (the second largest-circulated Italian daily) that under Jewish burial practices current at the time of Christ in a Roman colony such as Palestine, a body buried after a death sentence could only be returned to the family after a year in a common grave.
She says, "I think I have managed to read the burial certificate of Jesus the Nazarene, or Jesus of Nazareth."
However Dr Frale, who is to publish her findings in a new book, La Sindone di Gesu Nazareno (The Shroud of Jesus of Nazareth) said that the inscription provided "historical date consistent with the Gospels account". The letters, barely visible to the naked eye, were first spotted during an examination of the shroud in 1978, and others have since come to light.
Dr. Frale disputes the claims that the shroud was from the Middle Ages because the text written on the cloth refers to Jesus as "the Nazarene" and not the Son of God (which would have been considered heresy in medieval times).
The letter could only be properly deciphered through in negative photographs (sort of like a backwards writing being complete understood when held up to a mirror).
The death certificate was glued to the face of the deceased so that the body could be later recognized and retrieved.
Dr Frale said that the use of three languages was consistent with the polyglot nature of a community of Greek-speaking Jews in a Roman colony. Best known for her studies of the Knights Templar, who she claims at one stage, preserved the shroud, she further stated what she had deciphered was "the death sentence on a man called Jesus the Nazarene. If that man was also Christ the Son of God it is beyond my job to establish. I did not set out to demonstrate the truth of faith. I am a Catholic, but all my teachers have been atheists or agnostics, and the only believer among them was a Jew. I forced myself to work on this as I would have done on any other archaeological find."
This Article has been viewed 481 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)It is a very interesting bit of news Dr Rhymes, I happen to particularly like watching the History Channel and Discovery when they discuss the findings relating to the Bible and the middle ages.I am particularly happy they will be presenting it for public viewing. Such things are not for the select few, they are for the masses to make up their own mind about what they believe.What I really hate with a passion is when some official of the church or government makes a unilateral decision what is good for me to know and what is not. If the mob panics is because the person presenting the information is incompetent and 9 times out of 10 the news does not even shake the belief of core believers.Even if the shroud is an elaborate forgery, it is not for anyone to keep in their own private collection. It belongs to all of us because it gives us hope, maybe false hope, but hope none the less.Dealing with today's crises, we can all use some light, false or not. The financial crises proves that the powers that be do not necessarily know what is best and people are more resilient than they are given credit.We are not children, we are also not afraid to have our beliefs challenged. As this whole story unfolds I realize that the more fanatic the beliefs the more anxious the believer gets when facts show that they are wrong.Thanks for commenting Thoriso.I personally think that this is more of a story of interest, than a story of significance --- which is why I laid it out pretty much as Dr. Frale presented it, without any personal commentary.As I stated in the previous response, the need for these artificial appendages seems to run counter to what actual faith is ---- the evidence of things not seen.Thanks for stopping by and welcome to SearchWarp Thoriso.My pleasure, keep the articles coming.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.




